Tabby vs Converly Colors
Tabby vs Converly Colors compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Self-hosted Copilot alternative vs Twelve-step light and dark scales, exported as Design.md.
Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai
Tabby vs Converly Colors at a glance
| Spec | Tabby | Converly Colors |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | Self-hosted completion server | Browser-based color palette builder |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Runs locally | Self-hosted | No |
| Primary language | Rust | — |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Best for | teams wanting fully self-hosted completions | for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown |
| GitHub stars | 33.7k | — |
How Tabby and Converly Colors score
| Criterion | Tabby | Converly Colors |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | n/a |
| Maintenance | 4.0 | n/a |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 1.5 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Tabby
Tabby is a self-hosted AI coding assistant that provides completions across editors without sending code to a third party, with a team server you run yourself.
- Fully self-hosted, code never leaves your network
- Editor-agnostic completions
- Team server with repository context
Converly Colors
Converly Colors is a page on converly.es, run by a Spanish AI and web services firm, for building a color system in the browser: primary, secondary and background colors, typefaces per role, and twelve-step light and dark scales exported to Design.md. No price is stated; the interface is Spanish only. Note before using it: the page gives no license or terms for this tool, and anyone opening a shared link can export the same file.
- Twelve-step scales grouped by role, with a light and dark preview.
- Design.md export is described as one file with the scales, CSS variables and both modes.
- Typefaces set per role; border radius chosen from 0, 4, 8, 12 or 16 px.
Key differences
Tabby is self-hosted completion server, while Converly Colors is browser-based color palette builder. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs Proprietary), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Tabby leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Converly Colors is more suited to beginner users. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs No). In short, Tabby fits teams wanting fully self-hosted completions, and Converly Colors fits for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
Which should you choose?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Converly Colors for for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tabby or Converly Colors easier to use?
Converly Colors is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Tabby rewards more setup with more control.
Are Tabby and Converly Colors free?
Tabby is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Converly Colors is free to use but closed source. Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Tabby and Converly Colors locally?
Tabby: self-hosted · Converly Colors: no. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Tabby vs Converly Colors — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Converly Colors for for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →