Continue vs 
Tabby
Continue vs Tabby compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs Self-hosted Copilot alternative.
Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech
Continue vs Tabby at a glance
| Spec | Continue | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | IDE extension | Self-hosted completion server |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Runs locally | Cloud-optional | Self-hosted |
| Primary language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Intermediate |
| Best for | developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot | teams wanting fully self-hosted completions |
| GitHub stars | 35.2k | 33.8k |
Feature comparison
| Feature | Continue | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Autocomplete | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent mode | ✓ | ✗ |
| Local models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-IDE | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✓ |
How Continue and Tabby score
| Criterion | Continue | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of use | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Continue
Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.
- Works in VS Code and JetBrains
- Bring any model, including local via Ollama
- Highly customizable context and commands
Tabby
Tabby is a self-hosted AI coding assistant that provides completions across editors without sending code to a third party, with a team server you run yourself.
- Fully self-hosted, code never leaves your network
- Editor-agnostic completions
- Team server with repository context
Key differences
Continue is iDE extension, while Tabby is self-hosted completion server. Continue leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Tabby is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Self-hosted). In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and Tabby fits teams wanting fully self-hosted completions.
Which should you choose?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Tabby easier to use?
Continue is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Tabby rewards more setup with more control.
Are Continue and Tabby free?
Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Tabby is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Continue and Tabby locally?
Continue: cloud-optional · Tabby: self-hosted. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Continue vs Tabby — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →