Continue vs Converly Colors
Continue vs Converly Colors compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs Twelve-step light and dark scales, exported as Design.md.
Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai
Continue vs Converly Colors at a glance
| Spec | Continue | Converly Colors |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | IDE extension | Browser-based color palette builder |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Runs locally | Cloud-optional | No |
| Primary language | TypeScript | — |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Beginner |
| Best for | developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot | for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown |
| GitHub stars | 36.3k | — |
How Continue and Converly Colors score
| Criterion | Continue | Converly Colors |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | n/a |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | n/a |
| Ease of use | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 1.5 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Continue
Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.
- Works in VS Code and JetBrains
- Bring any model, including local via Ollama
- Highly customizable context and commands
Converly Colors
Converly Colors is a page on converly.es, run by a Spanish AI and web services firm, for building a color system in the browser: primary, secondary and background colors, typefaces per role, and twelve-step light and dark scales exported to Design.md. No price is stated; the interface is Spanish only. Note before using it: the page gives no license or terms for this tool, and anyone opening a shared link can export the same file.
- Twelve-step scales grouped by role, with a light and dark preview.
- Design.md export is described as one file with the scales, CSS variables and both modes.
- Typefaces set per role; border radius chosen from 0, 4, 8, 12 or 16 px.
Key differences
Continue is iDE extension, while Converly Colors is browser-based color palette builder. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs Proprietary), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs No). In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and Converly Colors fits for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
Which should you choose?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Converly Colors for for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Converly Colors easier to use?
Both sit at a similar level (Beginner). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.
Are Continue and Converly Colors free?
Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Converly Colors is free to use but closed source. Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Continue and Converly Colors locally?
Continue: cloud-optional · Converly Colors: no. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Continue vs Converly Colors — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Converly Colors for for front-end work needing a twelve-step light and dark palette in Markdown.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →