AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hy3 Open vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) Paid

Hy3 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Hy3OpenTencent
$0.08 /M input
$0.33 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)PaidMistral AI
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hy3 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) specs

SpecHy3Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)Winner
MakerTencentMistral AI
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryHy3
Context window262K tokens262K tokens= Tie
Input price$0.08/M · free self-host$0.25/MHy3
Output price$0.33/M · free self-host$0.75/MHy3
Vision / multimodalNoYesMistral Large 3 2512 (batch)
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)Hy3
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryHy3

Price gap & when to choose each

2.3×cheaper per output token

Hy3 is ~2.3× cheaper than Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) on output tokens ($0.33 vs $0.75 per M tokens).

Choose Hy3 if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityHy3Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hy3 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hy3 delivers 8.3× more intelligence per dollar.
Hy3
Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)
Intelligence index
25.8
9.7
Coding index
58.8
20.1
GPQA
89.7%
68%
Humanity's Last Exam
33.5%
4.2%
Long Context Reasoning
79%
36%
SciCode
48.6%
36.6%
τ-Bench Banking
22.9%
5.8%
Terminal-Bench
64.4%
12%
Math index
38
MMLU-Pro
80.7%
LiveCodeBench
46.5%
AIME 2025
38%
IFBench
36.2%
τ²-Bench
24.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
15.9%
Speed
86 tok/s
81.3 tok/s
Latency
1.72s
0.68s
Intelligence per $
107.1
12.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hy3 and Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hy3 (4.5 vs 3.3 / 5)
CriterionHy3Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)
Cost-efficiency5.05.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hy3 Open

Tencent · Open-weight

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Large 3 2512 is Mistral’s most capable model to date, featuring a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 41B active parameters (675B total), and released under the Apache 2.0 license.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hy3 previewHy4 previewHunyuan A13B InstructHy-MT2-30B-A3BHy-MT2-7BHy-MT2-1.8B

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 as good as Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch)?

Hy3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hy3 locally?

Yes. Hy3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hy3?

Hy3 costs $0.33/M output vs $0.75/M for Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) — roughly 2x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hy3 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Large 3 2512 (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →