AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hy3 Open vs o3 Paid

Hy3 vs o3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o3 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hy3 vs o3 specs

SpecHy3o3
MakerTencentOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window262K tokens200K tokens
Input price$0.13/M · free self-host$2/M
Output price$0.53/M · free self-host$8/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityHy3o3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hy3 vs o3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hy3 delivers 20× more intelligence per dollar.
Hy3
o3
Intelligence index
41.2
30.4
Coding index
58.8
GPQA
89.7%
82.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
31.6%
20%
Long Context Reasoning
66.7%
69.3%
SciCode
47.6%
41%
τ-Bench Banking
20.8%
Terminal-Bench
64.4%
Math index
88.3
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
MATH-500
99.2%
AIME
90.3%
AIME 2025
88.3%
IFBench
71.4%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
Speed
68.6 tok/s
127.1 tok/s
Latency
1.68s
5.92s
Intelligence per $
171
8.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hy3 and o3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hy3 (4.5 vs 3.0 / 5)
CriterionHy3o3
Cost-efficiency5.03.5
Context window4.04.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hy3 Open

Tencent · Open-weight

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hy3 previewHunyuan A13B Instruct
Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 Minio3 Mini Higho3 Deep Research

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 as good as o3?

Hy3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but o3 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hy3 locally?

Yes. Hy3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. o3 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hy3?

Hy3 costs $0.53/M output vs $8/M for o3 — roughly 15x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hy3 vs o3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o3 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →