AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs Grok 4.7 Paid

o3 vs Grok 4.7 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.7PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.7 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

o3 vs Grok 4.7 specs

Speco3Grok 4.7Winner
MakerOpenAIxAI–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window200K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.7
Input price$2/M$2/M= Tie
Output price$8/M$6/MGrok 4.7
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.7 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3Grok 4.7
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: o3 vs Grok 4.7

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.7 delivers 2.7× more intelligence per dollar.
o3
Grok 4.7
Intelligence index
20.2
46.4
Math index
88.3
–
GPQA
82.7%
–
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
43.1%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
76.7%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
–
MATH-500
99.2%
–
AIME
90.3%
–
AIME 2025
88.3%
–
IFBench
71.4%
–
τ²-Bench
80.7%
–
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
–
SciCode
–
57.4%
Speed
150 tok/s
75.9 tok/s
Latency
3.53s
14.32s
Intelligence per $
5.8
15.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and Grok 4.7 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.0 vs 3.2 / 5).
Criteriono3Grok 4.7
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

Grok 4.7 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High
Other variants tracked
Grok 4.6Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs Grok 4.7 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.7 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

o3 vs Grok 4.7 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.7 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →