AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs Grok 4.6 Paid

o3 vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

o3 vs Grok 4.6 specs

Speco3Grok 4.6Winner
MakerOpenAIxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$2/M= Tie
Output price$8/M$6/MGrok 4.6
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3Grok 4.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o3 vs Grok 4.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6 delivers 2.6× more intelligence per dollar.
o3
Grok 4.6
Intelligence index
20.2
44.4
Math index
88.3
GPQA
82.7%
94.9%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
80.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
MATH-500
99.2%
AIME
90.3%
AIME 2025
88.3%
IFBench
71.4%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
Coding index
76.8
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
114.5 tok/s
71.4 tok/s
Latency
6.58s
38.01s
Intelligence per $
5.8
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and Grok 4.6 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.0 vs 3.2 / 5).
Criteriono3Grok 4.6
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High
Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

o3 vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →