AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Muse Glimmer 30B Open vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Muse Glimmer 30BOpenMeta
$0.3 /M input
$1.1 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostYes
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewPaidGoogle
$2 /M input
$12 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specs

SpecMuse Glimmer 30BGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
MakerMetaGoogle
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryMuse Glimmer 30B
Context window131K tokens1M tokensGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Input price$0.3/M · free self-host$2/MMuse Glimmer 30B
Output price$1.1/M · free self-host$12/MMuse Glimmer 30B
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)Muse Glimmer 30B
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryMuse Glimmer 30B

Price gap & when to choose each

11×cheaper per output token

Muse Glimmer 30B is ~11× cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on output tokens ($1.1 vs $12 per M tokens).

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityMuse Glimmer 30BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Muse Glimmer 30B delivers 4.2× more intelligence per dollar.
Muse Glimmer 30B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence index
18.1
30.4
Coding index
49
68.8
GPQA
83.5%
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
22%
47%
Long Context Reasoning
83.3%
82%
SciCode
44.9%
58.7%
τ-Bench Banking
23.5%
21.4%
Terminal-Bench
51.7%
73.8%
IFBench
77.1%
τ²-Bench
95.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
53.8%
Speed
93.8 tok/s
125.2 tok/s
Latency
0.37s
24.48s
Intelligence per $
28.4
6.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Muse Glimmer 30B and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview score

🏆 Best value & openness: Muse Glimmer 30B (4.6 vs 3.2 / 5)
CriterionMuse Glimmer 30BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Cost-efficiency4.53.5
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Muse Glimmer 30B Open

Meta · Open-weight

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

Google · Proprietary

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)
Other variants tracked
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch)Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro (batch)Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B as good as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Muse Glimmer 30B is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Muse Glimmer 30B locally?

Yes. Muse Glimmer 30B has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $1.1/M output vs $12/M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — roughly 11x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →