AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Open vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpenDeepSeek
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostYes
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewPaidGoogle
$2 /M input
$12 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specs

SpecDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Context window1M tokens1M tokens= Tie
Input price$0.15/M · free self-host$2/MDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Output price$0.6/M · free self-host$12/MDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LicenseMITProprietaryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is ~20× cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on output tokens ($0.6 vs $12 per M tokens).

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash delivers 11× more intelligence per dollar.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence index
39.5
30.4
Humanity's Last Exam
39.2%
47%
Long Context Reasoning
84%
82%
SciCode
51.9%
58.7%
Coding index
68.8
GPQA
94.1%
IFBench
77.1%
τ²-Bench
95.6%
τ-Bench Banking
21.4%
Terminal-Bench
73.8%
Terminal-Bench Hard
53.8%
Speed
260.5 tok/s
125.2 tok/s
Latency
0.92s
24.48s
Intelligence per $
75.2
6.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview score

🏆 Best value & openness: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (5.0 vs 3.2 / 5)
CriterionDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Cost-efficiency5.03.5
Context window5.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Open

DeepSeek · Open-weight

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture. It activates 8B parameters on input and 16B on...

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

Google · Proprietary

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1R1 0528R1DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek V3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch)
Other variants tracked
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch)Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro (batch)Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsNano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as good as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash locally?

Yes. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.6/M output vs $12/M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — roughly 20x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →