AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hermes 4 70B Open vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Hermes 4 70B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specs

SpecHermes 4 70BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MakerNous ResearchGoogle
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window131K tokens1M tokens
Input price$0.13/M · free self-host$2/M
Output price$0.4/M · free self-host$12/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityHermes 4 70BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hermes 4 70B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence index
46.5
Coding index
68.8
GPQA
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
44.7%
Long Context Reasoning
72.7%
SciCode
58.9%
IFBench
77.1%
τ²-Bench
95.6%
τ-Bench Banking
16.5%
Terminal-Bench
73.8%
Terminal-Bench Hard
53.8%
Speed
137.1 tok/s
Latency
23.58s
Intelligence per $
10.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hermes 4 70B and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hermes 4 70B (4.1 vs 3.2 / 5)
CriterionHermes 4 70BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Cost-efficiency5.03.5
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hermes 4 70B Open

Nous Research · Open-weight

Hermes 4 70B is a hybrid reasoning model from Nous Research, built on Meta-Llama-3.1-70B. It introduces the same hybrid mode as the larger 405B release, allowing the model to either...

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Paid

Google · Proprietary

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hermes 4 405B
Other variants tracked
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Frequently asked questions

Is Hermes 4 70B as good as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Hermes 4 70B is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hermes 4 70B locally?

Yes. Hermes 4 70B has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hermes 4 70B?

Hermes 4 70B costs $0.4/M output vs $12/M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — roughly 30x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hermes 4 70B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →