Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid vs 
Command A+ Paid
Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Command A+ compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Claude Fable 5 (batch) — full profile › · Command A+ — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$1.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Command A+ specs
| Spec | Claude Fable 5 (batch) | Command A+ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Cohere | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 192K tokens | |
| Input price | $5/M | $0.3/M | |
| Output price | $25/M | $1.5/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Command A+ is ~17× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 (batch) on output tokens ($1.5 vs $25 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Claude Fable 5 (batch) | Command A+ |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Command A+
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Claude Fable 5 (batch) and Command A+ score
| Criterion | Claude Fable 5 (batch) | Command A+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid
Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...
Command A+ Paid
Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...
Frequently asked questions
Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Command A+ — which is cheaper?
Command A+ is cheaper on output ($1.5/M vs $25/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 (batch) offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Command A+ — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $25/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →