AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hy3 Open vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid

Hy3 vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hy3 vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) specs

SpecHy3Claude Fable 5 (batch)
MakerTencentAnthropic
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Input price$0.13/M · free self-host$5/M
Output price$0.53/M · free self-host$25/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityHy3Claude Fable 5 (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hy3 vs Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hy3 delivers 57× more intelligence per dollar.
Hy3
Claude Fable 5 (batch)
Intelligence index
41.2
59.9
Coding index
58.8
76.5
GPQA
89.7%
92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
31.6%
53.3%
Long Context Reasoning
66.7%
70%
SciCode
47.6%
60.2%
τ-Bench Banking
20.8%
26.8%
Terminal-Bench
64.4%
84.6%
IFBench
63.5%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
Speed
68.6 tok/s
59.4 tok/s
Latency
1.68s
61.86s
Intelligence per $
171
3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hy3 and Claude Fable 5 (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hy3 (4.5 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionHy3Claude Fable 5 (batch)
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window4.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hy3 Open

Tencent · Open-weight

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hy3 previewHunyuan A13B Instruct

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 as good as Claude Fable 5 (batch)?

Hy3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Claude Fable 5 (batch) may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hy3 locally?

Yes. Hy3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Claude Fable 5 (batch) is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hy3?

Hy3 costs $0.53/M output vs $25/M for Claude Fable 5 (batch) — roughly 47x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hy3 vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hy3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →