Continue vs 
Puppyone
Continue vs Puppyone compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs A local-first editor built for you and your agents.
Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai
Continue vs Puppyone at a glance
| Spec | Continue | Puppyone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | IDE extension | Local-first editor |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Runs locally | Cloud-optional | Cloud-optional |
| Primary language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Beginner |
| Best for | developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot | people who want their files and coding agents in one local workspace |
| GitHub stars | 35.7k | — |
How Continue and Puppyone score
| Criterion | Continue | Puppyone |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | n/a |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | n/a |
| Ease of use | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Continue
Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.
- Works in VS Code and JetBrains
- Bring any model, including local via Ollama
- Highly customizable context and commands
Puppyone
Puppyone is a local-first desktop editor for Markdown, documents, data files and media, with a built-in terminal that hosts coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode; files stay on your machine unless you opt into its cloud.
- Edits and previews rich files: Markdown, DOCX, XLSX, PDF, media
- Built-in terminal with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode
- Local Git history; files stay local unless you choose its cloud
Key differences
Continue is iDE extension, while Puppyone is local-first editor. In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and Puppyone fits people who want their files and coding agents in one local workspace.
Which should you choose?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Puppyone for people who want their files and coding agents in one local workspace.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Puppyone easier to use?
Both sit at a similar level (Beginner). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.
Are Continue and Puppyone free?
Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Puppyone is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Continue and Puppyone locally?
Continue: cloud-optional · Puppyone: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Continue vs Puppyone — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Puppyone for people who want their files and coding agents in one local workspace.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →