AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

XIMiMo-V2.5-Pro Open vs GPT-5.6 Sol Paid

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol specs

SpecMiMo-V2.5-ProGPT-5.6 Sol
MakerXiaomiOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens1.1M tokens
Input price$0.44/M · free self-host$5/M
Output price$0.87/M · free self-host$30/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityMiMo-V2.5-ProGPT-5.6 Sol
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

MiMo-V2.5-Pro delivers 15× more intelligence per dollar.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
GPT-5.6 Sol
Intelligence index
42.2
58.9
Coding index
60.2
77.4
GPQA
86.6%
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
33.8%
47.2%
Long Context Reasoning
73.3%
73.7%
SciCode
50.2%
56.1%
IFBench
79.9%
72.7%
τ²-Bench
94.2%
85.1%
τ-Bench Banking
8.7%
33%
Terminal-Bench
65.2%
88%
Terminal-Bench Hard
43.2%
65.9%
Speed
62.9 tok/s
71.7 tok/s
Latency
1.9s
56.83s
Intelligence per $
77.6
5.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How MiMo-V2.5-Pro and GPT-5.6 Sol score

🏆 Best value & openness: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (4.7 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionMiMo-V2.5-ProGPT-5.6 Sol
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Open

Xiaomi · Open-weight

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi’s flagship model, delivering strong performance in general agentic capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, with top rankings on benchmarks such as ClawEval, GDPVal, and SWE-bench Pro....

GPT-5.6 Sol Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for complex reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at command-line and multi-step coding tasks...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
MiMo-V2.5

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro as good as GPT-5.6 Sol?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-5.6 Sol may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run MiMo-V2.5-Pro locally?

Yes. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-5.6 Sol is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.87/M output vs $30/M for GPT-5.6 Sol — roughly 34x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →