AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

XIMiMo-V2.5-Pro Open vs o1-pro Paid

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs o1-pro compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o1-pro if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs o1-pro specs

SpecMiMo-V2.5-Proo1-pro
MakerXiaomiOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens200K tokens
Input price$0.44/M · free self-host$150/M
Output price$0.87/M · free self-host$600/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingYesNo
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityMiMo-V2.5-Proo1-pro
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs o1-pro

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

MiMo-V2.5-Pro delivers 776× more intelligence per dollar.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
o1-pro
Intelligence index
42.2
18.9
Coding index
60.2
GPQA
86.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
33.8%
Long Context Reasoning
73.3%
SciCode
50.2%
IFBench
79.9%
τ²-Bench
94.2%
τ-Bench Banking
8.7%
Terminal-Bench
65.2%
Terminal-Bench Hard
43.2%
Speed
62.9 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
1.9s
0s
Intelligence per $
77.6
0.1

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How MiMo-V2.5-Pro and o1-pro score

🏆 Best value & openness: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (4.7 vs 2.4 / 5)
CriterionMiMo-V2.5-Proo1-pro
Cost-efficiency5.02.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Open

Xiaomi · Open-weight

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi’s flagship model, delivering strong performance in general agentic capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, with top rankings on benchmarks such as ClawEval, GDPVal, and SWE-bench Pro....

o1-pro Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The o1 series of models are trained with reinforcement learning to think before they answer and perform complex reasoning. The o1-pro model uses more compute to think harder and provide...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
MiMo-V2.5

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro as good as o1-pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but o1-pro may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run MiMo-V2.5-Pro locally?

Yes. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. o1-pro is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.87/M output vs $600/M for o1-pro — roughly 690x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs o1-pro — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o1-pro if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →