AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

XIMiMo-V2.6-Pro Open vs Claude Opus 5.5 Paid

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

XIMiMo-V2.6-ProOpenXiaomi
$0.44 /M input
$0.87 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostYes
Claude Opus 5.5PaidAnthropic
$4 /M input
$20 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5 specs

SpecMiMo-V2.6-ProClaude Opus 5.5Winner
MakerXiaomiAnthropic–
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryXIMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Context window1.1M tokens1M tokensXIMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input price$0.44/M · free self-host$4/MXIMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Output price$0.87/M · free self-host$20/MXIMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)XIMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryXIMiMo-V2.6-Pro

Price gap & when to choose each

23×cheaper per output token

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ~23× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on output tokens ($0.87 vs $20 per M tokens).

XIChoose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityMiMo-V2.6-ProClaude Opus 5.5
Open weights (downloadable)✓✗
Self-hostable✓✗
Runs fully offline✓✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

MiMo-V2.6-Pro delivers 12× more intelligence per dollar.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Claude Opus 5.5
Intelligence index
46.3
57.6
Humanity's Last Exam
49.4%
61.4%
Long Context Reasoning
86.3%
84.7%
SciCode
60.9%
66.9%
Speed
38.4 tok/s
97.4 tok/s
Latency
3.78s
544.9s
Intelligence per $
85.1
7.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Claude Opus 5.5 score

🏆 Best value & openness: MiMo-V2.6-Pro (5.0 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionMiMo-V2.6-ProClaude Opus 5.5
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Open

Xiaomi · Open-weight

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi. Built at a scale of over 1T parameters, it is designed to push the ceiling of capability for the most demanding...

Claude Opus 5.5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5
Other variants tracked
Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 (batch)Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 (batch)Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)Claude Opus 4.1Claude Opus 4.1 (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro as good as Claude Opus 5.5?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Claude Opus 5.5 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run MiMo-V2.6-Pro locally?

Yes. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Claude Opus 5.5 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.87/M output vs $20/M for Claude Opus 5.5 — roughly 23x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →