AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs Command A+ Paid

Sonar Pro vs Command A+ compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Command A+PaidCohere
$0.3 /M input
$1.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window192K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro vs Command A+ specs

SpecSonar ProCommand A+Winner
MakerPerplexityCohere–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window200K tokens192K tokensSonar Pro
Input price$3/M$0.3/MCommand A+
Output price$15/M$1.5/MCommand A+
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesCommand A+
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Command A+ is ~10× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($1.5 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Command A+ if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProCommand A+
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✗✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs Command A+

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
Command A+
Intelligence index
7.6
13.1
GPQA
57.8%
76.1%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
12%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
–
MATH-500
74.5%
–
AIME
29%
–
Coding index
–
27.8
Long Context Reasoning
–
52.7%
SciCode
–
38.5%
IFBench
–
73.9%
τ²-Bench
–
80.7%
τ-Bench Banking
–
6%
Terminal-Bench
–
22.8%
Terminal-Bench Hard
–
25%
Speed
0 tok/s
137.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
0.25s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and Command A+ score

🏆 Best value & openness: Command A+ (3.1 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar ProCommand A+
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Command A+ Paid

Cohere · Proprietary

Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs Command A+ — which is cheaper?

Command A+ is cheaper on output ($1.5/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs Command A+ — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →