AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs Grok 4.6 Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs Grok 4.6 specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchGrok 4.6Winner
MakerPerplexityxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$3/M$2/MGrok 4.6
Output price$15/M$6/MGrok 4.6
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGrok 4.6
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

2.5×cheaper per output token

Grok 4.6 is ~2.5× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($6 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchGrok 4.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs Grok 4.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
Grok 4.6
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and Grok 4.6 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchGrok 4.6
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →