AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs Command A+ Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs Command A+ compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Command A+PaidCohere
$0.3 /M input
$1.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window192K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro Search if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs Command A+ specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchCommand A+Winner
MakerPerplexityCohere–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window200K tokens192K tokensSonar Pro Search
Input price$3/M$0.3/MCommand A+
Output price$15/M$1.5/MCommand A+
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesCommand A+
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Command A+ is ~10× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($1.5 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Command A+ if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchCommand A+
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✗✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs Command A+

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
Command A+
Intelligence index
–
13.1
Coding index
–
27.8
GPQA
–
76.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
–
12%
Long Context Reasoning
–
52.7%
SciCode
–
38.5%
IFBench
–
73.9%
τ²-Bench
–
80.7%
τ-Bench Banking
–
6%
Terminal-Bench
–
22.8%
Terminal-Bench Hard
–
25%
Speed
–
137.9 tok/s
Latency
–
0.25s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and Command A+ score

🏆 Best value & openness: Command A+ (3.1 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchCommand A+
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

Command A+ Paid

Cohere · Proprietary

Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs Command A+ — which is cheaper?

Command A+ is cheaper on output ($1.5/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro Search offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs Command A+ — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro Search if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →