AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Deep Research Paid vs Grok 4.6 Paid

Sonar Deep Research vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Deep ResearchPaidPerplexity
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

Sonar Deep Research vs Grok 4.6 specs

SpecSonar Deep ResearchGrok 4.6Winner
MakerPerplexityxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$2/M= Tie
Output price$8/M$6/MGrok 4.6
Vision / multimodalNoYesGrok 4.6
Tool / function callingNoYesGrok 4.6
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose Sonar Deep Research if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Deep ResearchGrok 4.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Deep Research vs Grok 4.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Deep Research
Grok 4.6
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Deep Research and Grok 4.6 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.3 / 5)
CriterionSonar Deep ResearchGrok 4.6
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window3.54.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Deep Research Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar Deep Research is a research-focused model designed for multi-step retrieval, synthesis, and reasoning across complex topics. It autonomously searches, reads, and evaluates sources, refining its approach as it gathers...

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Deep Research vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Sonar Deep Research vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →