AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Reka Flash 3 Open vs Mistral Medium 3.1 Paid

Reka Flash 3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Reka Flash 3OpenRekaai
$0.1 /M input
$0.2 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window66K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
Mistral Medium 3.1PaidMistral AI
$0.4 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Reka Flash 3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Reka Flash 3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 specs

SpecReka Flash 3Mistral Medium 3.1Winner
MakerRekaaiMistral AI
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryReka Flash 3
Context window66K tokens131K tokensMistral Medium 3.1
Input price$0.1/M · free self-host$0.4/MReka Flash 3
Output price$0.2/M · free self-host$2/MReka Flash 3
Vision / multimodalNoYesMistral Medium 3.1
Tool / function callingNoYesMistral Medium 3.1
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)Reka Flash 3
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryReka Flash 3

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Reka Flash 3 is ~10× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on output tokens ($0.2 vs $2 per M tokens).

Choose Reka Flash 3 if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 131K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityReka Flash 3Mistral Medium 3.1
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Reka Flash 3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Reka Flash 3
Mistral Medium 3.1
Intelligence index
5.6
9.9
Math index
33.7
38.3
GPQA
52.9%
58.8%
MMLU-Pro
66.9%
68.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.4%
4.7%
Long Context Reasoning
0%
LiveCodeBench
43.5%
40.6%
MATH-500
89.3%
AIME
51%
AIME 2025
33.7%
38.3%
IFBench
30.4%
39.8%
τ²-Bench
0%
40.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
0%
10.6%
Coding index
20.5
SciCode
32.4%
τ-Bench Banking
8.2%
Terminal-Bench
13.9%
Speed
85.9 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0.88s
0s
Intelligence per $
16
12.4

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Reka Flash 3 and Mistral Medium 3.1 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Reka Flash 3 (4.0 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionReka Flash 3Mistral Medium 3.1
Cost-efficiency5.04.5
Context window3.03.5
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Reka Flash 3 Open

Rekaai · Open-weight

Reka Flash 3 is a general-purpose, instruction-tuned large language model with 21 billion parameters, developed by Reka. It excels at general chat, coding tasks, instruction-following, and function calling. Featuring a...

Mistral Medium 3.1 Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Medium 3.1 is an updated version of Mistral Medium 3, which is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Reka Edge

Frequently asked questions

Is Reka Flash 3 as good as Mistral Medium 3.1?

Reka Flash 3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Mistral Medium 3.1 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Reka Flash 3 locally?

Yes. Reka Flash 3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Mistral Medium 3.1 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 costs $0.2/M output vs $2/M for Mistral Medium 3.1 — roughly 10x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Reka Flash 3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Reka Flash 3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →