Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Mistral Medium 3.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Mistral Medium 3.1 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | NVIDIA | Mistral AI | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131K tokens | |
| Input price | $0.15/M · free self-host | $0.4/M | |
| Output price | $0.5/M · free self-host | $2/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | Proprietary |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is ~4.0× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on output tokens ($0.5 vs $2 per M tokens).
| Capability | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is an open multimodal mixture-of-experts model from NVIDIA, with 12B active parameters out of 120B total. It takes text, images, documents, GUI screenshots, and video...
Mistral Medium 3.1 is an updated version of Mistral Medium 3, which is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Mistral Medium 3.1 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Mistral Medium 3.1 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.5/M output vs $2/M for Mistral Medium 3.1 — roughly 4x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →