AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs Sonar Paid

o3 vs Sonar compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SonarPaidPerplexity
$1 /M input
$1 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window127K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $8/M). Choose o3 if you need the larger 200K context window.

o3 vs Sonar specs

Speco3SonarWinner
MakerOpenAIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens127K tokenso3
Input price$2/M$1/MSonar
Output price$8/M$1/MSonar
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoo3
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

8.0×cheaper per output token

Sonar is ~8.0× cheaper than o3 on output tokens ($1 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3Sonar
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o3 vs Sonar

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o3
Sonar
Intelligence index
20.2
7.7
Math index
88.3
GPQA
82.7%
47.1%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
68.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
4.9%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
29.5%
MATH-500
99.2%
81.7%
AIME
90.3%
48.7%
AIME 2025
88.3%
IFBench
71.4%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
Speed
114.5 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
6.58s
0s
Intelligence per $
5.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and Sonar score

🏆 Best value & openness: o3 (3.0 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono3Sonar
Cost-efficiency3.54.5
Context window4.03.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

Sonar Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs Sonar — which is cheaper?

Sonar is cheaper on output ($1/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

o3 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

o3 vs Sonar — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $8/M). Choose o3 if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →