AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs SASakana Namazu Paid

o3 vs Sakana Namazu compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SASakana NamazuPaidSakana AI
$0.95 /M input
$4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sakana Namazu for the lower output price ($4/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

o3 vs Sakana Namazu specs

Speco3Sakana NamazuWinner
MakerOpenAISakana AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens262K tokensSASakana Namazu
Input price$2/M$0.95/MSASakana Namazu
Output price$8/M$4/MSASakana Namazu
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

2.0×cheaper per output token

Sakana Namazu is ~2.0× cheaper than o3 on output tokens ($4 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
SAChoose Sakana Namazu if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3Sakana Namazu
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o3 vs Sakana Namazu

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o3
Sakana Namazu
Intelligence index
20.2
Math index
88.3
GPQA
82.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
MATH-500
99.2%
AIME
90.3%
AIME 2025
88.3%
IFBench
71.4%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
Speed
114.5 tok/s
Latency
6.58s
Intelligence per $
5.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and Sakana Namazu score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.0 vs 3.1 / 5).
Criteriono3Sakana Namazu
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

Sakana Namazu Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Sakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs Sakana Namazu — which is cheaper?

Sakana Namazu is cheaper on output ($4/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sakana Namazu offers the larger context window (262K tokens).

o3 vs Sakana Namazu — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sakana Namazu for the lower output price ($4/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →