AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs o4 Mini Paid

o3 vs o4 Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
o4 MiniPaidOpenAI
$1.1 /M input
$4.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $8/M). Choose o3 if you need the larger 200K context window.

o3 vs o4 Mini specs

Speco3o4 MiniWinner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens200K tokens= Tie
Input price$2/M$1.1/Mo4 Mini
Output price$8/M$4.4/Mo4 Mini
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

1.8×cheaper per output token

o4 Mini is ~1.8× cheaper than o3 on output tokens ($4.4 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose o4 Mini if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3o4 Mini
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o3 vs o4 Mini

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o3
o4 Mini
Intelligence index
20.2
16.7
Math index
88.3
90.7
GPQA
82.7%
78.4%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
83.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
16.5%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
61%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
85.9%
MATH-500
99.2%
98.9%
AIME
90.3%
94%
AIME 2025
88.3%
90.7%
IFBench
71.4%
68.7%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
55.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
15.2%
Speed
114.5 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
6.58s
0s
Intelligence per $
5.8
8.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and o4 Mini score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.0 vs 3.1 / 5).
Criteriono3o4 Mini
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

o4 Mini Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

OpenAI o4-mini is a compact reasoning model in the o-series, optimized for fast, cost-efficient performance while retaining strong multimodal and agentic capabilities. It supports tool use and demonstrates competitive reasoning...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High
Other variants tracked
o4 Mini Higho4 Mini (batch)

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs o4 Mini — which is cheaper?

o4 Mini is cheaper on output ($4.4/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

o3 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

o3 vs o4 Mini — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $8/M). Choose o3 if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →