AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o3 Paid vs o1 Paid

o3 vs o1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o3PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose o3 for the lower output price ($8/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 200K context window.

o3 vs o1 specs

Speco3o1Winner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens200K tokens= Tie
Input price$2/M$15/Mo3
Output price$8/M$60/Mo3
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

7.5×cheaper per output token

o3 is ~7.5× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($8 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo3o1
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o3 vs o1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o3 delivers 9.7× more intelligence per dollar.
o3
o1
Intelligence index
20.2
15.2
Math index
88.3
GPQA
82.7%
74.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
84.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.1%
7%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
65%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
67.9%
MATH-500
99.2%
97%
AIME
90.3%
72.3%
AIME 2025
88.3%
IFBench
71.4%
70.3%
τ²-Bench
80.7%
62.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
37.1%
12.9%
Coding index
39.7
Speed
114.5 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
6.58s
0s
Intelligence per $
5.8
0.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o3 and o1 score

🏆 Best value & openness: o3 (3.0 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono3o1
Cost-efficiency3.52.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o3 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o3 Proo3 (batch)o3 Minio3 Mini (batch)o3 Mini High

Frequently asked questions

o3 vs o1 — which is cheaper?

o3 is cheaper on output ($8/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

o3 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

o3 vs o1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose o3 for the lower output price ($8/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →