AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs Solar Mini 4 Paid

o1 vs Solar Mini 4 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Solar Mini 4PaidUpstage
$0.05 /M input
$0.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window524K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Mini 4 for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

o1 vs Solar Mini 4 specs

Speco1Solar Mini 4Winner
MakerOpenAIUpstage–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window200K tokens524K tokensSolar Mini 4
Input price$15/M$0.05/MSolar Mini 4
Output price$60/M$0.2/MSolar Mini 4
Vision / multimodalYesNoo1
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

300×cheaper per output token

Solar Mini 4 is ~300× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($0.2 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Mini 4 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 524K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1Solar Mini 4
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✗
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: o1 vs Solar Mini 4

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Solar Mini 4 delivers 229× more intelligence per dollar.
o1
Solar Mini 4
Intelligence index
15.2
24.1
Coding index
39.7
–
GPQA
74.7%
–
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
25.8%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
83.3%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
–
MATH-500
97%
–
AIME
72.3%
–
IFBench
70.3%
–
τ²-Bench
62.6%
–
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
–
SciCode
–
47.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
101.4 tok/s
Latency
0s
1.09s
Intelligence per $
0.6
137.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and Solar Mini 4 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Solar Mini 4 (3.1 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono1Solar Mini 4
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Solar Mini 4 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Mini 4 is Upstage's compact, cost-efficient language model, a 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window. It is built for agentic use cases where response...

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs Solar Mini 4 — which is cheaper?

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on output ($0.2/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Solar Mini 4 offers the larger context window (524K tokens).

o1 vs Solar Mini 4 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Mini 4 for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →