AI Models · Paid vs Paid

AMNova Premier 1.0 Paid vs Mistral Medium 3 Paid

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

AMNova Premier 1.0PaidAmazon
$2.5 /M input
$12.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Mistral Medium 3PaidMistral AI
$0.4 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Mistral Medium 3 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $12.5/M). Choose Nova Premier 1.0 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 specs

SpecNova Premier 1.0Mistral Medium 3Winner
MakerAmazonMistral AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens131K tokensAMNova Premier 1.0
Input price$2.5/M$0.4/MMistral Medium 3
Output price$12.5/M$2/MMistral Medium 3
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

6.3×cheaper per output token

Mistral Medium 3 is ~6.3× cheaper than Nova Premier 1.0 on output tokens ($2 vs $12.5 per M tokens).

AMChoose Nova Premier 1.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityNova Premier 1.0Mistral Medium 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Nova Premier 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Nova Premier 1.0
Mistral Medium 3
Intelligence index
9
Math index
30.3
GPQA
57.8%
MMLU-Pro
76%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.1%
Long Context Reasoning
31.3%
LiveCodeBench
40%
MATH-500
90.7%
AIME
44%
AIME 2025
30.3%
IFBench
39.3%
τ²-Bench
24.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
3.8%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
11.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Nova Premier 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionNova Premier 1.0Mistral Medium 3
Cost-efficiency3.54.5
Context window5.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Nova Premier 1.0 Paid

Amazon · Proprietary

Amazon Nova Premier is the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models.

Mistral Medium 3 Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Medium 3 is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances state-of-the-art reasoning and multimodal performance with 8× lowe

Frequently asked questions

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 — which is cheaper?

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $12.5/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mistral Medium 3 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $12.5/M). Choose Nova Premier 1.0 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →