AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

MELongCat 2.0 Open vs Mistral Medium 3 Paid

LongCat 2.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

MELongCat 2.0OpenMeituan
$0.3 /M input
$1.2 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
Mistral Medium 3PaidMistral AI
$0.4 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose LongCat 2.0 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

LongCat 2.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 specs

SpecLongCat 2.0Mistral Medium 3Winner
MakerMeituanMistral AI
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryMELongCat 2.0
Context window1M tokens131K tokensMELongCat 2.0
Input price$0.3/M · free self-host$0.4/MMELongCat 2.0
Output price$1.2/M · free self-host$2/MMELongCat 2.0
Vision / multimodalNoYesMistral Medium 3
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)MELongCat 2.0
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryMELongCat 2.0

Price gap & when to choose each

1.7×cheaper per output token

LongCat 2.0 is ~1.7× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3 on output tokens ($1.2 vs $2 per M tokens).

MEChoose LongCat 2.0 if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityLongCat 2.0Mistral Medium 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: LongCat 2.0 vs Mistral Medium 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

LongCat 2.0 delivers 3.3× more intelligence per dollar.
LongCat 2.0
Mistral Medium 3
Intelligence index
19.7
9
Coding index
45.3
GPQA
78%
57.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
33.7%
4.1%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
31.3%
SciCode
36.3%
τ-Bench Banking
13.2%
Terminal-Bench
50.2%
Math index
30.3
MMLU-Pro
76%
LiveCodeBench
40%
MATH-500
90.7%
AIME
44%
AIME 2025
30.3%
IFBench
39.3%
τ²-Bench
24.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
3.8%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
37.5
11.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How LongCat 2.0 and Mistral Medium 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: LongCat 2.0 (4.6 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionLongCat 2.0Mistral Medium 3
Cost-efficiency4.54.5
Context window5.03.5
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

LongCat 2.0 Open

Meituan · Open-weight

LongCat 2.0 is a sparse mixture-of-experts language model from Meituan, with 48B active parameters out of 1.6T total. It is suited for coding, repository-level changes, long-horizon problem solving, and agentic...

Mistral Medium 3 Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Medium 3 is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances state-of-the-art reasoning and multimodal performance with 8× lowe

Frequently asked questions

Is LongCat 2.0 as good as Mistral Medium 3?

LongCat 2.0 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Mistral Medium 3 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run LongCat 2.0 locally?

Yes. LongCat 2.0 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Mistral Medium 3 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is LongCat 2.0?

LongCat 2.0 costs $1.2/M output vs $2/M for Mistral Medium 3 — roughly 2x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

LongCat 2.0 vs Mistral Medium 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →