Llama 4 Maverick Open vs 
Mistral Medium 3.1 Paid
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Mistral Medium 3.1 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.1 specs
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input price | $0.2/M · free self-host | $0.4/M |
| Output price | $0.8/M · free self-host | $2/M |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) |
| License | Llama Community | Proprietary |
Feature comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.1 score
| Criterion | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Llama 4 Maverick Open
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
Mistral Medium 3.1 Paid
Mistral Medium 3.1 is an updated version of Mistral Medium 3, which is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick as good as Mistral Medium 3.1?
Llama 4 Maverick is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Mistral Medium 3.1 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Can I run Llama 4 Maverick locally?
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Mistral Medium 3.1 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
How much cheaper is Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.8/M output vs $2/M for Mistral Medium 3.1 — roughly 3x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.1 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →