AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Hermes 4 70B Open vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Paid

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Hermes 4 70B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash specs

SpecHermes 4 70BGemini 3.5 Flash
MakerNous ResearchGoogle
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window131K tokens1M tokens
Input price$0.13/M · free self-host$1.5/M
Output price$0.4/M · free self-host$9/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityHermes 4 70BGemini 3.5 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Hermes 4 70B
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Intelligence index
50.2
Coding index
70.1
GPQA
92.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
41%
Long Context Reasoning
69.3%
SciCode
53.1%
IFBench
76.3%
τ²-Bench
95.3%
τ-Bench Banking
25.4%
Terminal-Bench
78.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard
40.9%
Speed
293.7 tok/s
Latency
12.74s
Intelligence per $
14.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Hermes 4 70B and Gemini 3.5 Flash score

🏆 Best value & openness: Hermes 4 70B (4.1 vs 3.2 / 5)
CriterionHermes 4 70BGemini 3.5 Flash
Cost-efficiency5.03.5
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Hermes 4 70B Open

Nous Research · Open-weight

Hermes 4 70B is a hybrid reasoning model from Nous Research, built on Meta-Llama-3.1-70B. It introduces the same hybrid mode as the larger 405B release, allowing the model to either...

Gemini 3.5 Flash Paid

Google · Proprietary

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Hermes 4 405B
Other variants tracked
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGemini 2.5 Flash

Frequently asked questions

Is Hermes 4 70B as good as Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Hermes 4 70B is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Gemini 3.5 Flash may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Hermes 4 70B locally?

Yes. Hermes 4 70B has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Gemini 3.5 Flash is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Hermes 4 70B?

Hermes 4 70B costs $0.4/M output vs $9/M for Gemini 3.5 Flash — roughly 23x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Hermes 4 70B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Hermes 4 70B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →