AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs Sonar Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Sonar compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SonarPaidPerplexity
$1 /M input
$1 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window127K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Sonar specs

SpecGrok 4.6SonarWinner
MakerxAIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens127K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$1/MSonar
Output price$6/M$1/MSonar
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoGrok 4.6
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

6.0×cheaper per output token

Sonar is ~6.0× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($1 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Sonar
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Sonar

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
Sonar
Intelligence index
44.4
7.7
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
47.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
4.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
MMLU-Pro
68.9%
LiveCodeBench
29.5%
MATH-500
81.7%
AIME
48.7%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
0s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Sonar score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.7 / 5)
CriterionGrok 4.6Sonar
Cost-efficiency4.04.5
Context window4.53.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Sonar Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Sonar — which is cheaper?

Sonar is cheaper on output ($1/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Sonar — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →