AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs AMNova Lite 1.0 Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
AMNova Lite 1.0PaidAmazon
$0.06 /M input
$0.24 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window300K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Nova Lite 1.0 for the lower output price ($0.24/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0 specs

SpecGrok 4.6Nova Lite 1.0Winner
MakerxAIAmazon
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens300K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$0.06/MAMNova Lite 1.0
Output price$6/M$0.24/MAMNova Lite 1.0
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

25×cheaper per output token

Nova Lite 1.0 is ~25× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($0.24 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
AMChoose Nova Lite 1.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Nova Lite 1.0
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
Nova Lite 1.0
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Nova Lite 1.0 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionGrok 4.6Nova Lite 1.0
Cost-efficiency4.05.0
Context window4.54.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Nova Lite 1.0 Paid

Amazon · Proprietary

Amazon Nova Lite 1.0 is a very low-cost multimodal model from Amazon that focused on fast processing of image, video, and text inputs to generate text output. Amazon Nova Lite...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0 — which is cheaper?

Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper on output ($0.24/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Nova Lite 1.0 for the lower output price ($0.24/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →