AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs Muse Spark 1.2 Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Muse Spark 1.2PaidMeta
$1.25 /M input
$4.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 for the lower output price ($4.25/M vs $6/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 specs

SpecGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2Winner
MakerxAIMeta
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens1M tokensMuse Spark 1.2
Input price$2/M$1.25/MMuse Spark 1.2
Output price$6/M$4.25/MMuse Spark 1.2
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
Muse Spark 1.2
Intelligence index
44.4
39.8
Coding index
76.8
72.2
GPQA
94.9%
90.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
45.5%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
79%
SciCode
56.5%
57.4%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
34.8%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
80.1%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
250.1 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
10.81s
Intelligence per $
14.8
19.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Muse Spark 1.2 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2
Cost-efficiency4.04.0
Context window4.55.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Muse Spark 1.2 Paid

Meta · Proprietary

Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents, returns text, and offers a 1M-token context...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 — which is cheaper?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper on output ($4.25/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 for the lower output price ($4.25/M vs $6/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →