AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) Paid

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)PaidOpenAI
$1 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window4K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for the lower output price ($2/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) specs

SpecGrok 4.6GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Winner
MakerxAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens4K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$1/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Output price$6/M$2/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Vision / multimodalYesNoGrok 4.6
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

3.0×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is ~3.0× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($2 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6 delivers more intelligence per dollar.
Grok 4.6
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Intelligence index
44.4
5.5
Coding index
76.8
10.7
GPQA
94.9%
29.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
MMLU-Pro
46.2%
MATH-500
44.1%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
0s
Intelligence per $
14.8
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.5 / 5)
CriterionGrok 4.6GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Cost-efficiency4.04.5
Context window4.52.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for the lower output price ($2/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →