AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT Audio Paid vs Grok 4.6 Paid

GPT Audio vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT AudioPaidOpenAI
$2.5 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

GPT Audio vs Grok 4.6 specs

SpecGPT AudioGrok 4.6Winner
MakerOpenAIxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2.5/M$2/MGrok 4.6
Output price$10/M$6/MGrok 4.6
Vision / multimodalNoYesGrok 4.6
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

1.7×cheaper per output token

Grok 4.6 is ~1.7× cheaper than GPT Audio on output tokens ($6 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose GPT Audio if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT AudioGrok 4.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT Audio vs Grok 4.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT Audio
Grok 4.6
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT Audio and Grok 4.6 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionGPT AudioGrok 4.6
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window3.54.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT Audio Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

GPT Audio vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $10/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

GPT Audio vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →