AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Paid vs Solar Mini 4 Paid

GPT-4 vs Solar Mini 4 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4PaidOpenAI
$30 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window8K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Solar Mini 4PaidUpstage
$0.05 /M input
$0.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window524K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Mini 4 for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

GPT-4 vs Solar Mini 4 specs

SpecGPT-4Solar Mini 4Winner
MakerOpenAIUpstage–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window8K tokens524K tokensSolar Mini 4
Input price$30/M$0.05/MSolar Mini 4
Output price$60/M$0.2/MSolar Mini 4
Vision / multimodalNoNo–
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

300×cheaper per output token

Solar Mini 4 is ~300× cheaper than GPT-4 on output tokens ($0.2 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Mini 4 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 524K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4Solar Mini 4
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✗✗
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: GPT-4 vs Solar Mini 4

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Solar Mini 4 delivers 688× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4
Solar Mini 4
Intelligence index
6.7
24.1
Coding index
13.1
–
GPQA
34.9%
–
MMLU-Pro
56.2%
–
MATH-500
56.8%
–
IFBench
33.2%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
–
25.8%
Long Context Reasoning
–
83.3%
SciCode
–
47.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
101.4 tok/s
Latency
0s
1.09s
Intelligence per $
0.2
137.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 and Solar Mini 4 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Solar Mini 4 (3.1 vs 2.0 / 5)
CriterionGPT-4Solar Mini 4
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window2.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

OpenAI's flagship model, GPT-4 is a large-scale multimodal language model capable of solving difficult problems with greater accuracy than previous models due to its broader general knowledge and advanced reasoning...

Solar Mini 4 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Mini 4 is Upstage's compact, cost-efficient language model, a 35B-parameter mixture-of-experts with 3B active parameters and a 524K context window. It is built for agentic use cases where response...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 vs Solar Mini 4 — which is cheaper?

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on output ($0.2/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Solar Mini 4 offers the larger context window (524K tokens).

GPT-4 vs Solar Mini 4 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Mini 4 for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →