AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs Mistral Medium 3 Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Mistral Medium 3PaidMistral AI
$0.4 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Mistral Medium 3 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 131K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3 specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3Winner
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens131K tokensMistral Medium 3
Input price$10/M$0.4/MMistral Medium 3
Output price$30/M$2/MMistral Medium 3
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

15×cheaper per output token

Mistral Medium 3 is ~15× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($2 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 131K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Mistral Medium 3 delivers 23× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4 Turbo
Mistral Medium 3
Intelligence index
7
9
Coding index
21.5
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
76%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
4.1%
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
40%
MATH-500
73.7%
90.7%
AIME
15%
44%
Math index
30.3
GPQA
57.8%
Long Context Reasoning
31.3%
AIME 2025
30.3%
IFBench
39.3%
τ²-Bench
24.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
3.8%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
0.5
11.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral Medium 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Mistral Medium 3 (3.1 vs 2.8 / 5)
CriterionGPT-4 TurboMistral Medium 3
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

Mistral Medium 3 Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Medium 3 is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances state-of-the-art reasoning and multimodal performance with 8× lowe

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3 — which is cheaper?

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Mistral Medium 3 offers the larger context window (131K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mistral Medium 3 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 131K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →