AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs Grok 4.7 Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.7 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.7PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.7 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.7 specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.7Winner
MakerOpenAIxAI–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window128K tokens500K tokensGrok 4.7
Input price$10/M$2/MGrok 4.7
Output price$30/M$6/MGrok 4.7
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

5.0×cheaper per output token

Grok 4.7 is ~5.0× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($6 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.7 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.7
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.7

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.7 delivers 31× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4 Turbo
Grok 4.7
Intelligence index
7
46.4
Coding index
21.5
–
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
43.1%
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
–
MATH-500
73.7%
–
AIME
15%
–
Long Context Reasoning
–
76.7%
SciCode
–
57.4%
Speed
0 tok/s
75.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
14.32s
Intelligence per $
0.5
15.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and Grok 4.7 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.7 (3.2 vs 2.8 / 5)
CriterionGPT-4 TurboGrok 4.7
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window3.54.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

Grok 4.7 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.6Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.7 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.7 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok 4.7 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.7 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →