AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs Command A+ Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs Command A+ compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

GPT-4 Turbo — full profile ›  ·  Command A+ — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Command A+PaidCohere
$0.3 /M input
$1.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window192K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 192K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Command A+ specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboCommand A+Winner
MakerOpenAICohere–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window128K tokens192K tokensCommand A+
Input price$10/M$0.3/MCommand A+
Output price$30/M$1.5/MCommand A+
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Command A+ is ~20× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($1.5 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Command A+ if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 192K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboCommand A+
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs Command A+

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-4 Turbo
Command A+
Intelligence index
7
13.1
Coding index
21.5
27.8
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
12%
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
–
MATH-500
73.7%
–
AIME
15%
–
GPQA
–
76.1%
Long Context Reasoning
–
52.7%
SciCode
–
38.5%
IFBench
–
73.9%
τ²-Bench
–
80.7%
τ-Bench Banking
–
6%
Terminal-Bench
–
22.8%
Terminal-Bench Hard
–
25%
Speed
0 tok/s
137.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
0.25s
Intelligence per $
0.5
–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and Command A+ score

🏆 Best value & openness: Command A+ (3.1 vs 2.8 / 5)
CriterionGPT-4 TurboCommand A+
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

Command A+ Paid

Cohere · Proprietary

Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs Command A+ — which is cheaper?

Command A+ is cheaper on output ($1.5/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Command A+ offers the larger context window (192K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs Command A+ — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Command A+ for the lower output price ($1.5/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 192K context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-4 TurboDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 (batch) vs GPT-4 TurboGLM 5.3 (batch) vs Command A+Hy3 vs GPT-4 TurboHy3 vs Command A+

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →