AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4.1 Paid vs Grok 4.6 Paid

GPT-4.1 vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4.1PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

GPT-4.1 vs Grok 4.6 specs

SpecGPT-4.1Grok 4.6Winner
MakerOpenAIxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens500K tokensGPT-4.1
Input price$2/M$2/M= Tie
Output price$8/M$6/MGrok 4.6
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose GPT-4.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4.1Grok 4.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4.1 vs Grok 4.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6 delivers 4.1× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4.1
Grok 4.6
Intelligence index
12.7
44.4
Math index
34.7
GPQA
66.6%
94.9%
MMLU-Pro
80.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.2%
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
68.3%
80.3%
LiveCodeBench
45.7%
MATH-500
91.3%
AIME
43.7%
AIME 2025
34.7%
IFBench
43%
τ²-Bench
47.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
13.6%
Coding index
76.8
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
0 tok/s
71.4 tok/s
Latency
0s
38.01s
Intelligence per $
3.6
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4.1 and Grok 4.6 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.2 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4.1Grok 4.6
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window5.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4.1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4.1 is a flagship large language model optimized for advanced instruction following, real-world software engineering, and long-context reasoning. It supports a 1 million token context window and outperforms GPT-4o and...

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-4.1 (batch)GPT-4.1 MiniGPT-4.1 Mini (batch)GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4.1 vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

GPT-4.1 vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $8/M). Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →