AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra Paid vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu UltraPaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Claude Fable 5 (batch)PaidAnthropic
$5 /M input
$25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) for the lower output price ($25/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) specs

SpecFugu UltraClaude Fable 5 (batch)Winner
MakerSakana AIAnthropic
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens= Tie
Input price$5/M$5/M= Tie
Output price$30/M$25/MClaude Fable 5 (batch)
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

SAChoose Fugu Ultra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu UltraClaude Fable 5 (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5 (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra
Claude Fable 5 (batch)
Intelligence index
49.7
Coding index
76.5
GPQA
92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
SciCode
61%
IFBench
63.5%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
Speed
70 tok/s
Latency
60.71s
Intelligence per $
2.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra and Claude Fable 5 (batch) score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionFugu UltraClaude Fable 5 (batch)
Cost-efficiency3.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

Claude Fable 5 (batch) Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) — which is cheaper?

Claude Fable 5 (batch) is cheaper on output ($25/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5 (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) for the lower output price ($25/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →