AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Paid vs Grok 4.5 Paid

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Grok 4.5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $15/M). Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.5
MakerAnthropicxAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens500K tokens
Input price$3/M$2/M
Output price$15/M$6/M
Vision / multimodalYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.5
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.5 delivers 2.3× more intelligence per dollar.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Grok 4.5
Intelligence index
47.2
53.8
Coding index
63
72.4
GPQA
87.5%
93.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
30%
40.3%
Long Context Reasoning
70.7%
67.7%
SciCode
46.8%
54.1%
IFBench
56.6%
τ²-Bench
75.7%
τ-Bench Banking
30.5%
32.6%
Terminal-Bench
71.2%
81.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
53%
Speed
69.6 tok/s
74.9 tok/s
Latency
51.32s
13.39s
Intelligence per $
7.9
17.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.2 / 5).
CriterionClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.5
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model yet, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It excels at iterative development, complex codebase navigation, end-to-end project management with...

Grok 4.5 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.5 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 5
Other variants tracked
Grok 4.3

Frequently asked questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 — which is cheaper?

Grok 4.5 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Grok 4.5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $15/M). Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →