AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Paid vs GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 — full profile ›  ·  GPT-5.6 Terra — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for the lower output price ($15/M vs $15/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokens
Input price$3/M$2.5/M
Output price$15/M$15/M
Vision / multimodalYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-5.6 Terra
Intelligence index
47.2
55
Coding index
63
76.7
GPQA
87.5%
92.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
30%
41.8%
Long Context Reasoning
70.7%
74%
SciCode
46.8%
53.9%
IFBench
56.6%
71.2%
τ²-Bench
75.7%
86.3%
τ-Bench Banking
30.5%
31.8%
Terminal-Bench
71.2%
88%
Terminal-Bench Hard
53%
57.6%
Speed
69.6 tok/s
153.9 tok/s
Latency
51.32s
102.59s
Intelligence per $
7.9
9.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra
Cost-efficiency3.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model yet, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It excels at iterative development, complex codebase navigation, end-to-end project management with...

GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 5

Frequently asked questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra — which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper on output ($15/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Terra offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for the lower output price ($15/M vs $15/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 TerraGLM 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 TerraMiniMax M3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6MiniMax M3 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →