Open-Source AI · Speech (STT / TTS)

Vozo vs Silero VAD

Vozo vs Silero VAD compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Dub video in the speaker's own cloned voice vs Detect speech in audio, instantly.

Updated regularly · curated by olud.ai

Choose Vozo for teams localising product, course or social video without an editing suite. Choose Silero VAD for real-time voice assistants.

Vozo vs Silero VAD at a glance

SpecVozoSilero VAD
CategorySpeech (STT / TTS)Speech (STT / TTS)
TypeVideo dubbing & translation (SaaS)Voice activity detection
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Runs locallyNoYes
Primary languagePython
Ease of useBeginnerBeginner
Best forteams localising product, course or social video without an editing suitereal-time voice assistants
GitHub stars10.1k

How Vozo and Silero VAD score

🏆 Overall edge: Silero VAD — 4.6 vs 3.3 / 5
CriterionVozoSilero VAD
Popularityn/a3.0
Maintenancen/a5.0
Ease of use5.05.0
Privacy3.55.0
License freedom1.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Vozo

Video dubbing & translation (SaaS) · Proprietary

Vozo is a commercial web app that runs a whole video-localisation pipeline in one pass: speech recognition, translation, text-to-speech with voice cloning, lip synchronisation and on-screen text replacement. It advertises 160+ target languages and regional accent variants. It is closed source and hosted only — the video is uploaded to their servers — with a free tier before subscription.

  • One pass from source video to dubbed video, no tool switching
  • Voice cloning with a choice of regional accent, not a generic AI voice
  • Re-translates text baked into the picture — slides, captions, overlays
Visit Vozo →

Silero VAD

Voice activity detection · MIT

Silero VAD detects which parts of an audio stream contain speech, in under a millisecond per chunk — essential for real-time voice pipelines.

  • Sub-millisecond detection
  • Tiny model, runs anywhere
  • Essential for streaming voice
See the Silero VAD page →

Key differences

Vozo is video dubbing & translation (SaaS), while Silero VAD is voice activity detection. Their licenses differ (Proprietary vs MIT), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (No vs Yes). In short, Vozo fits teams localising product, course or social video without an editing suite, and Silero VAD fits real-time voice assistants.

Which should you choose?

Choose Vozo for teams localising product, course or social video without an editing suite. Choose Silero VAD for real-time voice assistants.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Vozo or Silero VAD easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Beginner). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are Vozo and Silero VAD free?

Vozo is free to use but closed source, and Silero VAD is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Vozo and Silero VAD locally?

Vozo: no · Silero VAD: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Vozo vs Silero VAD — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Vozo for teams localising product, course or social video without an editing suite. Choose Silero VAD for real-time voice assistants.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →