Open-Source AI · Document AI & OCR

Docling vs MinerU

Docling vs MinerU compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. IBM-grade document understanding vs PDF to Markdown with formulas and tables.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Docling for teams building document pipelines for RAG. Choose MinerU for scientific PDFs with formulas.

Docling vs MinerU at a glance

SpecDoclingMinerU
CategoryDocument AI & OCRDocument AI & OCR
TypeDocument parsing toolkitDocument extractor
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useIntermediateIntermediate
Best forteams building document pipelines for RAGscientific PDFs with formulas
GitHub stars63.9k76.2k

How Docling and MinerU score

🏆 Overall edge: Docling — 4.6 vs 4.3 / 5
CriterionDoclingMinerU
Popularity4.54.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.53.5
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.03.5

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Docling

Document parsing toolkit · MIT

Docling parses PDFs, DOCX, PPTX and images into structured representations with layout, tables and reading order, designed to plug straight into RAG frameworks.

  • Rich structured output: layout, tables, reading order
  • First-class integrations with LangChain and LlamaIndex
  • Backed by IBM Research, MIT-licensed
See the Docling page →

MinerU

Document extractor · AGPL-3.0

MinerU extracts text, tables, formulas and images from PDFs into Markdown or JSON, handling scientific documents particularly well.

  • Extracts formulas as LaTeX
  • Strong table structure recovery
  • Handles scanned documents
See the MinerU page →

Key differences

Docling is document parsing toolkit, while MinerU is document extractor. Their licenses differ (MIT vs AGPL-3.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. In short, Docling fits teams building document pipelines for RAG, and MinerU fits scientific PDFs with formulas.

Which should you choose?

Choose Docling for teams building document pipelines for RAG. Choose MinerU for scientific PDFs with formulas.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Docling or MinerU easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Intermediate). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are Docling and MinerU free?

Docling is free and open source (MIT), and MinerU is free and open source (AGPL-3.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Docling and MinerU locally?

Docling: yes · MinerU: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Docling vs MinerU — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Docling for teams building document pipelines for RAG. Choose MinerU for scientific PDFs with formulas.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →