Open-Source AI · Self-hosted chat UI

big-AGI vs Kotaemon

big-AGI vs Kotaemon compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Pro-grade chat for many models vs Clean open UI to chat with documents.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose big-AGI for a powerful multi-provider chat UI. Choose Kotaemon for teams wanting a ready-made document QA UI.

big-AGI vs Kotaemon at a glance

Specbig-AGIKotaemon
CategorySelf-hosted chat UISelf-hosted chat UI
TypeSelf-hosted AI chat UIRAG chat UI
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Runs locallySelf-hostedSelf-hosted
Primary languageTypeScriptPython
Ease of useBeginnerBeginner
Best fora powerful multi-provider chat UIteams wanting a ready-made document QA UI
GitHub stars7.1k25.7k

How big-AGI and Kotaemon score

🤝 Too close to call — big-AGI and Kotaemon land within a hair (4.4 vs 4.6 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
Criterionbig-AGIKotaemon
Popularity2.53.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use5.05.0
Privacy4.54.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

big-AGI

Self-hosted AI chat UI · MIT

big-AGI is a feature-rich, self-hostable AI suite with a polished chat UI, supporting many providers, personas, multi-model beam and advanced tools.

  • Supports dozens of model providers
  • Personas, beam and advanced tooling
  • Polished, fast interface
See the big-AGI page →

Kotaemon

RAG chat UI · Apache-2.0

Kotaemon is a clean, open-source RAG interface for chatting with your documents, with citations, multi-user support and a customizable pipeline for developers.

  • Answers with inline citations and previews
  • Both end-user UI and developer framework
  • Gradio-based, easy to theme and extend
See the Kotaemon page →

Key differences

big-AGI is self-hosted AI chat UI, while Kotaemon is rAG chat UI. Their licenses differ (MIT vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. In short, big-AGI fits a powerful multi-provider chat UI, and Kotaemon fits teams wanting a ready-made document QA UI.

Which should you choose?

Choose big-AGI for a powerful multi-provider chat UI. Choose Kotaemon for teams wanting a ready-made document QA UI.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is big-AGI or Kotaemon easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Beginner). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are big-AGI and Kotaemon free?

big-AGI is free and open source (MIT), and Kotaemon is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run big-AGI and Kotaemon locally?

big-AGI: self-hosted · Kotaemon: self-hosted. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

big-AGI vs Kotaemon — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose big-AGI for a powerful multi-provider chat UI. Choose Kotaemon for teams wanting a ready-made document QA UI.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →