Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

AutoGen vs LangGraph

AutoGen vs LangGraph compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Microsoft's conversational agent framework vs Stateful, controllable agent graphs.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose AutoGen for researchers building conversational agent systems. Choose LangGraph for developers needing controllable agent workflows.

AutoGen vs LangGraph at a glance

SpecAutoGenLangGraph
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeMulti-agent frameworkAgent orchestration (graphs)
LicenseMITMIT
Runs locallyCloud-optionalCloud-optional
Primary languagePythonPython / JS
Ease of useAdvancedAdvanced
Best forresearchers building conversational agent systemsdevelopers needing controllable agent workflows
GitHub stars60.1k38.4k

Feature comparison

FeatureAutoGenLangGraph
Multi-agent
Tool / function calling
Code execution
Memory
Human-in-the-loop
Graph control

How AutoGen and LangGraph score

🤝 Too close to call — AutoGen and LangGraph land within a hair (3.9 vs 4.0 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionAutoGenLangGraph
Popularity4.54.0
Maintenance4.05.0
Ease of use2.52.5
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

AutoGen

Multi-agent framework · MIT

AutoGen — the official full name, short for “Automated Generation” — is Microsoft’s open-source framework for building multi-agent AI systems where agents converse to solve tasks, with strong support for code execution and tool use.

  • Flexible multi-agent conversation patterns
  • Strong code-execution and tool-use support
  • Backed by Microsoft Research
See the AutoGen page →

LangGraph

Agent orchestration (graphs) · MIT

LangGraph is a library for building stateful, controllable agents as graphs, giving you fine-grained control over loops, branching and persistence.

  • Explicit, controllable agent state machines
  • Persistence and human-in-the-loop built in
  • Integrates with the LangChain ecosystem
See the LangGraph page →

Key differences

AutoGen is multi-agent framework, while LangGraph is agent orchestration (graphs). In short, AutoGen fits researchers building conversational agent systems, and LangGraph fits developers needing controllable agent workflows.

Which should you choose?

Choose AutoGen for researchers building conversational agent systems. Choose LangGraph for developers needing controllable agent workflows.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoGen or LangGraph easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Advanced). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are AutoGen and LangGraph free?

AutoGen is free and open source (MIT), and LangGraph is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run AutoGen and LangGraph locally?

AutoGen: cloud-optional · LangGraph: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

AutoGen vs LangGraph — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose AutoGen for researchers building conversational agent systems. Choose LangGraph for developers needing controllable agent workflows.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →