Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

Agno vs smolagents

Agno vs smolagents compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Fast, lightweight multi-modal agents vs Agents in a few lines of code.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose smolagents for simple code-writing agents, fast.

Agno vs smolagents at a glance

SpecAgnosmolagents
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAgent frameworkMinimal agent library
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalCloud-optional
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useIntermediateBeginner
Best forfast agents with memory and toolssimple code-writing agents, fast
GitHub stars41.5k28.6k

How Agno and smolagents score

🏆 Overall edge: smolagents — 4.4 vs 3.9 / 5
CriterionAgnosmolagents
Popularity4.03.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.55.0
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Agno

Agent framework · MPL-2.0

Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight, high-performance framework for building multi-modal agents with memory, knowledge and tools, plus a monitoring UI.

  • Very fast agent instantiation
  • Built-in memory, knowledge and tools
  • Multi-modal and model-agnostic
See the Agno page →

smolagents

Minimal agent library · Apache-2.0

smolagents is Hugging Face's minimalist library for building agents that think in code, with first-class support for any LLM and Hugging Face tools.

  • Tiny API, agents in a few lines
  • Code-first agents that are easy to debug
  • Backed by Hugging Face
See the smolagents page →

Key differences

Agno is agent framework, while smolagents is minimal agent library. Their licenses differ (MPL-2.0 vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Agno leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas smolagents is more suited to beginner users. In short, Agno fits fast agents with memory and tools, and smolagents fits simple code-writing agents, fast.

Which should you choose?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose smolagents for simple code-writing agents, fast.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agno or smolagents easier to use?

smolagents is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Agno rewards more setup with more control.

Are Agno and smolagents free?

Agno is free and open source (MPL-2.0), and smolagents is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Agno and smolagents locally?

Agno: cloud-optional · smolagents: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Agno vs smolagents — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose smolagents for simple code-writing agents, fast.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →