Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

Agno vs Letta

Agno vs Letta compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Fast, lightweight multi-modal agents vs Stateful agents with long-term memory.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

Agno vs Letta at a glance

SpecAgnoLetta
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAgent frameworkAgent runtime (memory)
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalSelf-hosted
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useIntermediateAdvanced
Best forfast agents with memory and toolsagents that remember across sessions
GitHub stars41.5k24k

How Agno and Letta score

🤝 Too close to call — Agno and Letta land within a hair (3.9 vs 4.1 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionAgnoLetta
Popularity4.03.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.52.5
Privacy3.54.5
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Agno

Agent framework · MPL-2.0

Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight, high-performance framework for building multi-modal agents with memory, knowledge and tools, plus a monitoring UI.

  • Very fast agent instantiation
  • Built-in memory, knowledge and tools
  • Multi-modal and model-agnostic
See the Agno page →

Letta

Agent runtime (memory) · Apache-2.0

Letta (formerly MemGPT) is a framework and server for building stateful agents with long-term memory that persists across sessions, with a visual agent editor.

  • Persistent long-term agent memory
  • Server with REST API and visual editor
  • Model-agnostic and self-hostable
See the Letta page →

Key differences

Agno is agent framework, while Letta is agent runtime (memory). Their licenses differ (MPL-2.0 vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Agno leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Letta is more suited to advanced users. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Self-hosted). In short, Agno fits fast agents with memory and tools, and Letta fits agents that remember across sessions.

Which should you choose?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agno or Letta easier to use?

Agno is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Letta rewards more setup with more control.

Are Agno and Letta free?

Agno is free and open source (MPL-2.0), and Letta is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Agno and Letta locally?

Agno: cloud-optional · Letta: self-hosted. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Agno vs Letta — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Letta for agents that remember across sessions.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →