AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Reasoning Pro Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct Paid

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Reasoning ProPaidPerplexity
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructPaidOpenAI
$1.5 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window4K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct for the lower output price ($2/M vs $8/M). Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro if you need the larger 128K context window.

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct specs

SpecSonar Reasoning ProGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructWinner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens4K tokensSonar Reasoning Pro
Input price$2/M$1.5/MGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Output price$8/M$2/MGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Reasoning Pro
Tool / function callingNoNo
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

4.0×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is ~4.0× cheaper than Sonar Reasoning Pro on output tokens ($2 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 128K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Reasoning ProGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Reasoning Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Reasoning Pro
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Intelligence index
11.8
5.5
MATH-500
95.7%
44.1%
AIME
79%
Coding index
10.7
GPQA
29.7%
MMLU-Pro
46.2%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Reasoning Pro and GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct score

🏆 Best value & openness: Sonar Reasoning Pro (2.6 vs 2.2 / 5)
CriterionSonar Reasoning ProGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Cost-efficiency3.54.5
Context window3.52.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.52.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Reasoning Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) Sonar Reasoning Pro is a premier reasoning model powe

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

This model is a variant of GPT-3.5 Turbo tuned for instructional prompts and omitting chat-related optimizations. Training data: up to Sep 2021.

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Reasoning Pro offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct for the lower output price ($2/M vs $8/M). Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →